On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:52:09PM -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:10:31PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d > wrote: > > On 12/4/2014 11:41 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > >Can we pretty please use the term "type qualifier" instead of "type > > >constructor"? ;-) > > > > I think "type constructor" is the more pedantically correct term, > > but you'll have to ask Andrei :-) > > Recently there was a bug filed by Andrei himself, and a bunch of > merged PRs, that renamed "type constructor" to "type qualifier". The > general sense I got was that we're deprecating "type constructor" in > preference for "type qualifier". [...]
FYI: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 T -- "A man's wife has more power over him than the state has." -- Ralph Emerson
