Re: struct default constructor, unions and bizaro behavior.

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 21:57:42 UTC, deadalnix wrote:

struct S {
     union {
         T1 t1;
         T2 t2;
     }

     T3 t3;
}

T1 a1;
T3 a3;
S(a1, a3);

This is erroring because t1 is set twice. It turns out that the
second parameter of the struct map to t2 rather than t3.

This behavior do not make any sense, ever. Why is that the
default ?

Isn't using named union instead an option?