BCS wrote:
Hello Jeremie,
making it impossible to also pick a worst one.
"worst" no. But it's easy to find "worse" languages, just start listing
languages no one uses.
Yeah, but its like calling for a failed experiment, there is no such
thing, only experiments. Think of these "worse" languages as experiments
on how not to design languages :)
Besides I was talking about better or worse in the scope of languages
which are actually used.
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Walter Bright
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 bearophile
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Jeremie Pelletier
- IDEs and programming languages Walter Bright
- Re: IDEs and programming languages Jeremie Pelletier
- Re: IDEs and programming languages Bill Baxter
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Walter Bright
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Jeremie Pelletier
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 BCS
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Jeremie Pelletier
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Walter Bright
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Jeremie Pelletier
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Walter Bright
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Jeremie Pelletier
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Walter Bright
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Lutger
- Re: How Nested Functions Work, part 2 Walter Bright