So to sum things up
1. you blindly walked into something you had no real experience
with, apart from some vague memory that some parts of vibed
worked for you a while ago.
Pure bile. No - reread the thread.
2. you knew the debugger might be an issue, if not _the_ issue,
but chose not to test it beforehand, or couldn't test it
beforehand, because
3. you were working on a foreign framework (and simply hoped
things would work out fine, fingers crossed!).
Isn't that what you would hope? I would.
These are crucial bits of information that were missing from
your first report.
Please try to be more accurate the next time. Holding back
crucial information gets us nowhere. It only leaves the (false)
impression that D is completely unusable.
How can you read this thread and think he was holding back
anything. Everything he says is *easily* relatable and
understandable. Besides he is trying to provide valuable
information in a way that is much less abusive than many of the
threads in this community. What I read was not that "D is
completely unusable" but rather "the D debug story on Windows is
a big problem and it lost D some potential users".
