On Sunday, 21 December 2014 at 12:26:04 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-12-21 10:46, Dicebot wrote:
- better user-defined type support (any built-in type must be
possible
to emulate via user aggregate)
Any specifics to achieve this?
Stuff that immediately comes to my mind:
- some way to define implicit conversion from literals (done at
CT)
- either http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP63 or some other solution to
define tuple-like entities
- solve the issue with impossibility of stripping head const for
user-defined container types same as it is down for arrays
