On 21/12/14 11:11, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sunday, 21 December 2014 at 08:23:34 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
See also: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10996
I have nothing against this, but this is, indeed, completely out of the scope
(!) of the DIP.
I think it belongs to DIP22
In fact it's already in there:
A public alias to a private symbol makes the symbol
accessibly through the alias. The alias itself needs
to be in the same module, so this doesn't impair
protection control.
It's just not implemented for alias this.
