yes - please resurrect D1!!!!!!!!!!!
+100
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:16:32 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 12:59:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 15:49:46 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
resolution. How about providing it as a separate compiler build
I feel like dropping D1 was not such a good move. Especially if
full ABI compatibility with D2, people could have chose to
write some of the less critical modules of their software in D2
(along with the enthusiasm of discovery), while still having a
stable&non-experimental compiler for the really critical things.
Then, D1 would have become D1.5 by integrating the D2
time-proven features etc., just as D2 could become D2.5.
Is too late (or undesired) to resurrect D1 in maintenance mode?
It is a bit strange that one of the most successful stories of
D (Sociomantic) uses D1, still the compiler is ignored and
everybody seems pretending that is a D (D2) success story.
