On Tuesday, 30 December 2014 at 04:27:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
appealing, and that is frustration. After all _anyone_
concerned with the state of ddox could check for themselves in
less than a minute by attempting to build the docs. The
irritation pattern that seems to be present in this group as of
late only invites more of it.
Well, to fix something, one would first need to know that it's
broken. (It would take me more than a minute to check as I don't
use dub or have it installed.)
The better route out of this is to kindly invite contributors
who added ddox support, and all others who are interested, to
improve ddox build to the point of making it robustly usable. I
trust you are out there reading this. Thanks.
I think you are entirely right in that such issues should be
resolved not by D project leaders, but delegated to Dub/DDox
maintainers. But we should be aware of possible communication
issues regarding in whose court the ball is at the moment.
I've filed an issue, hope this helps:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues/69
