On 02/01/15 22:03, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The thing is, ( ) naturally pair in code, and naturally paired ( ) are not an
issue in Ddoc. One never sees [..) in code (maybe Mathematica supports it).
Er, I believe I posted an example of just that :-)
I'm entirely open to the possibility of reworking the 'uniform' function so that
its bounds are indicated in a different way, but it _is_ something that
currently occurs in D code (albeit not frequently).
Grep the Phobos sources, the only stray paren issue in it is the use of [..) in
a few places in the documentation. I know it's irritating for you, but it simply
is not prevalent.
I can live with you not addressing my irritation :-) But since we're discussing
how to improve Ddoc, I thought it best to make sure that my issues with it were
well described and understood.
