On 1/3/2015 5:12 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Are you saying const was a mistake? Should we be trying to avoid using
const? And use that as justification against in this case?
const to me suggested a limit on what we can do in pushing annotations on
people. It is also quite simple in concept.
I was firmly in support of Marc's design. I'm not sure why it was rejected.
What were the problems? Why did it become a storage class, other than
because of fear that it might pervade too deeply if it were part of
the type?
It will pervade deeply if it was part of the type.
"Maybe some track lighting will help!"
--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=P9FHlhWqbus#t=17
Umm, I don't understand?
Bob Vila's flip answer, as if nobody thought of adding lights to better light up
a dark room.
