On 1/6/15 1:48 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2015 2:04 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
To give you an example of why that sucks, imagine that your accessor for
member_x is nothrow, but your setter is not. This means you either
"make an
exception", or you just split up obvious file-mates into separate
corners.
Source control gets confused if one of those attributes changes.
Nobody is happy.
Grouping by attributes is probably one of the worst ways to have
readable/maintainable code.
One of the most important reasons why unittests are so successful is
that you
can just plop the code that tests a function right next to it. So easy
to find
the code, so easy to maintain when you change the target of the test.
Making
some way to bundle attributes, or be able to negate currently one-way
attributes
would go a long way IMO.
I know and agree. I was just responding to the 'impossible'
characterization.
OK, Mr. Literal :) Sorry, I should have said "impossible without totally
screwing up the code"
-Steve
