On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 11:50:04 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 10:37:43 UTC, Mike James wrote:
"Walter Bright" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
The interesting part of those rules is that in the end, C +
rules
+ static analyzer ends up being the type of language that the C
designers decided to ignore.
In their defense, not really. The line they usually use is that
"C provides freedom". One cannot deny that C provides the freedom
to be bent according to the MISRA and JPL standards.
Yes, it is not sane by default. But it gives one the freedom to
be sane or to be mad...
