On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:05:09 +0000 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 12:43:05 UTC, ketmar via > Digitalmars-d wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:37:22 +0000 > > Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> On 10/01/2015 22:11, Walter Bright wrote: > >> > On 1/10/2015 12:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > >> > > >> > 2. it tends to end bikeshedding arguments about the right > >> > way to format > >> > things > >> > >> No, it wouldn't. The tool would have to support formatting > >> options, not just one style (or the tool would be crap). And > >> even then, people could argue about what the default > >> formatting should be... > > default should be one that used in Phobos. > > phobos is very APIish, most of business logic do not look like > that. that's why formatter must have alot of options to tune. but *default* set must be one that used in Phobos. just to end any converstion like this with "'cause it's used in Phobos. period."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
