On 2015-01-19 13:00, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
<[email protected]>" wrote:
I would suggest you avoid frameworks since they go out of fashion fairly
quickly and makes maintenance dependent on individuals (with framework
knowledge). jQuery adds little value since browsers are fairly
standards-compliant these days, IMO.
These are well established frameworks used by very many developers. I
would bet that each of them have more users than D has. If you don't
like frameworks you free to call the tools something else.
http://caniuse.com/#feature_sort=score
It would also look very bad if you cannot run dlang.org on D tech. I
suggest using dlang.org for driving phobos implementation/binding of
standard w3 web tech. No point in having D marketing other languages or
their frameworks.
I guess you stopped reading after "Rails" since I said it would be
better to use vibe.d.
1. semantic markup i XML (DDoc 2 XML would be a good startingpoint)
2. XSLT for transforming XML to HTML5
3. K.I.S.S. design wise: WAI+HTML5+CSS3 (marginal use of JS)
I suggested well established tools for web development. I can't say that
is true for Ddoc. I also never heard of anyone using XSLT for web
development.
It would be better to use dlang.org development to drive the design of
vibe.d and phobos and front D as a capable server tech.
Again, you just stopped reading the post.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
