When I read discusion about @nothrow @pure... I start thinking
what will happen if go that way.
If we make an agreement on @pure and so on we are ok now because
pure is a keyword already. But if there will be that consensus
all other attributes should have @ in name. For eg. we add
@virtual or @forceinline. This could cause some code breakage if
someone already use UDA with this name.
One way how to avoid it would be allow @pure @virtual and others
only on right side so it would not clash with UDAs so this code
will work:
struct virtual {}
class C
{
@virtual void someFun() @virtual {}
}
But it does not look OK for me.
So I think it would be nice to have some name convention for
UDAs, so one can be sure it will never be in conflict with
compiler attributes.
So what do you think?
