On 1/28/15 10:19 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 17:41:54 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
PLUS, this would be very simple to implement!
Then I recommend you submit a pull request.
Mike
I would but Walter said no. I'm certain he misunderstood my proposal
and I tried to explain it to him but I couldn't get him to address it.
Was that the proposal leading to this state of affairs (quoting from
your post on 2015/01/26 16:05 PST?
Here's what would change
-----------------------------------------------------------------
void myfunc() nogc; // VALID (Only if this proposal is accepted)
void myfunc() safe; // VALID (Only if this proposal is accepted)
Here's what WOULD NOT change
-----------------------------------------------------------------
nogc myfunc(); // STILL INVALID: invalid unless it can be verified
// that this wouldn't result in ambiguity
// in the grammar
void myfunc() @nogc; // STILL VALID (no change)
@nogc myfunc(); // STILL VALID (no change)
Andrei
