Re: Another idiom I wish were gone from phobos/druntime

[Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 08:22:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
No. It's just a frustratingly common mistake - like saying "for 
all
intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes."
Unfortunately, many folks couldn't care less about getting it 
right...

Well, when you grow up hearing it, you reach for the notion and 
the words just come out before you can apply the filter. 
Irregardless, same difference.