On 2/5/15 5:12 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/5/2015 4:13 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I know this definition. It have tried it in practice and concluded as
being
absolutely useless. There is no way I am going to return back to this
broken
concept - better to ignore @safe completely as misfeature if you
insist on doing
things that way.
I'm sorry I haven't been able to convince you. I don't have any more
arguments other than just repeating myself.
Moving forward, I must insist that use of @trusted in such a way as to
make its surrounding context not mechanically checkable is no longer
acceptable in Phobos.
If need be, I will rewrite std.array myself to address this.
But D is a systems programming language, not a B&D language, and anyone
will be free to ignore @safe and continue to use the other benefits of
D, or use @safe in a way that conforms to their own formulation of best
practices.
I second this. -- Andrei
