Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
I think it sounds interesting enough, but I can't help but wonder if
this is a feature that you've really thought through (especially wrt.
how it interacts with mechanisms such as template mixins and normal
symbol inheritance), or if you just want it to support some pattern
you want to use in Phobos 2.

I've known for a long time this was in store if we want to define decent reflection. It's also been a perennial source of trouble with a lot of code that needs to inject members.

I don't see how that would be needed for reflection, and I've written some custom reflection/serialization myself. Yay for tupleof being able to read even private members.

Reply via email to