On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 06:08:31PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 2/8/2015 5:52 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote: > >On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 01:41:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > >>Anyone interested in taking up this flag? > > > >Is this idea different from the one in std.internal.test.dummyrange? > > I wasn't aware of the existence of that. Will check it out.
And while we're at it, we might want to look at consolidating some of the other unittest-specific stuff that's sprinkled throughout Phobos modules, such as in std.algorithm.package (search for "rndstuff" in package.d). T -- Why waste time reinventing the wheel, when you could be reinventing the engine? -- Damian Conway
