On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 17:45:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/9/15 1:39 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I think this is crucial if we want to keep actual Phobos
sources easily
review-able within your requirements. There is a good value in
having
`core.stdc` to map C headers 1-to-1 though.
Would you consider separate `core.safestdc` package tree where
such
wrappers could be put on per need basis (duplicating tree
structure of
core.stdc modules internally)
Walter opposes this on grounds of increased maintenance
burdens. He points out (rightly imho) that we better focus on
the higher-level primitives present in Phobos. -- Andrei
I foresee certain stdc-based primitives being duplicated over and
over again as nested functions - in scope of complying with
"minimal @trusted function that exposes @safe API" rule.
