On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:32:59 +0000, weaselcat wrote: > I see it as quite a shame that people repeatedly say they actively avoid > using classes in D in favor of structs where possible, until forced to > use classes.
it has nothing with GC per se, i just don't like the concept. not epsecially D classes, but the whole C++-inspired thing (yes, i know that it wasn't C++ invention; yet it's C++ which popularized it). current OOP is overrated. and real smalltalk-like OOP is not very vell suitable for static typed languages. i'm still slowly developing a BlackBox-like system, though, that is fully based on classes and modules. yet i don't want to develop it too far before DDMD arrives. and i don't have a codegen (alas, this problem seems unsolvable).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
