Re: Memory safety depends entirely on GC ?

[Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 04:19:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:

On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 22:13:09 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:

malloc+free can be trusted if wrapped in something like a ref counted pointer, no?

Foo bazoom;

class Foo {
    void bar() {
        bazoom = this;
    }
}

void foo() {
    RefCounted!Foo f = ...
    f.bar();

    // bazoom is now a dandling pointer.
}

I see, thanks.

Is assigning 'this' from a member function the only problem case?