On 28/02/2015 2:29 a.m., Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 23/02/15 12:30, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 23 February 2015 at 01:30, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
<[email protected]> wrote:
I could prolly do two talks... especially if someone else wants to
suggest a
topic. Heck, I could improvise in a round table or something too.
I'd happily be on a panel talk. :)
It would be really nice if there could be an organized panel talk of the
maintainers and major contributors of the various D compilers out there
(including DDMD and SDC).
Send in a proposal for it then.
I did one for a round table. Which would most likely have overlap.
Because this is a general proposal and the number of people associated
with it must be later determined, biography is being left out.
The topics that will be discussed are unknown at this point, so keywords
will also be left out.
Title: How Does D Fend?
Kind: Round table
Target audience: Beginners and those on the fence
Abstract:
Majority of talks at DConf 2015 are aimed at those who are already in
the D community. A round table for those who are not entirely vested
should enable those that are not to ask questions and get answers from a
range of people. An example of this is (Richard Cattermole) who has got
good solid knowledge of Compile Time Function Execution of code in the D
language. Along side others including: dmd and phobos contributes.
Others from e.g. vibe.d and even students from UVU would give full range
of skill level a chance to talk about a topic.
Extended description:
The round table discussion could take a very long time and each topic
discussed could in turn be long drawn out. From this a set time limit
per topic should be attached. The time limit chosen should be determined
based upon the entire given time allocated for the round table.
Each topic is discussed in three stages.
Introduction, what does everyone know about the topic?
Discussion, discuss between the members issues and future potential
for the topic
Summary, most members should be able to agree what the current
state and future potential lies. Giving an answer to the person who
asked the question.
Primarily a time limit should be placed upon the discussion.
Introduction and summary being so fundamental it should not have it on it.
The choosing of questions should be done by somebody who is not on the
round table. They should gather it from a range of locations. The live
stream chat, Twitter and live audience are the most common ones.
The audience should be open for non DConf visitors. At the very least
UVU staff and students. UVU students should be part of the round table.
