On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 04:18:38 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:51:54 +0000, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 04:13:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
In that case, you shouldn't be subject to any kind of race
conditions.
But we can't make the library/language based on this
assumption. Your
case is the exceptional case.
His case is not @safe, so we can ignore that problem.
the compiler tends to disagree:
=== test.d ===
int myglobal;
class A {
~this () @safe { if (myglobal == 42) assert(0); }
}
void main () {
auto a = new A;
}
======
dmd -w -c -o- test.d
wow! no warnings, no errors!
Slighty off-topic,
If DIP74 is approved it would be nice if destructors were
redesigned(and possibly dropped altogether for non-deterministic
lifetimes.)
