On 2/28/15 7:53 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <[email protected]>"
wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 21:19:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/15 1:07 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about this, if we're serious about @safe actually*guaranteeing*
anything: after 2.067 is released, we reimplement @safe by making it
reject every language construct by default.
I don't think this is practical. It's a huge amount of work over a
long time.
That's easy enough to solve, though.
I figure there are ways to go about it. I just don't find it practical.
It might have been a good idea eight years ago. -- Andrei
