On Sunday, 1 March 2015 at 16:45:04 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Sunday, 1 March 2015 at 01:40:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
One possible solution is to add a "@mutable" or "@metadata" attribute similar to C++'s keyword "mutable". Walter and I both dislike that solution because it's hamfisted and leaves too much opportunity for abuse - people can essentially create unbounded amounts of mutable payload for an object claimed to be immutable. That makes it impossible (or unsafe) to optimize code based on algebraic assumptions.

I need to get educated on this issue. First suggestion: Just break the type system by encouraging the idiom of using casts in opAddRef and opRelease. It's too easy, but I don't know why.

Well I guess it's about optimizing code. So the question is what the optimizer needs to know, and why.

Reply via email to