On Wednesday, 4 March 2015 at 09:06:01 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/4/2015 12:13 AM, deadalnix wrote:
The #1 argument for DIP25 compared to alternative proposal was
its simplicity. I
assume at this point that we have empirical evidence that this
is NOT the case.
The complexity of a free list doesn't remotely compare to that
of adding an ownership system.
My reference safety system has ownership built in, more-or-less
for free:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
See also my reply to deadalnix:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
