On Wednesday, 4 March 2015 at 17:12:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
No tiring like it is to have to explain obvious details to a
child.
Safety system is only partially proactive in a sense it doesn't
cover all possible scenarios, of one finds a bug, he provides an
example, illustrating the bug (did int myglobal do it? if it was
a child thing, why it was got wrong?). And scenarios tend to be
very non-obvious, especially if one speaks about yet unseen bug.
How an unknown bug can be obvious? And you believe, that
expressing yourself in Nostradamus style greatly helps make
things obvious? What things in safety system are on a child level
at all? You should have a longer way to go down to a child
argument.
