On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 09:03:11 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 07:55 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 3/13/15 6:45 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> The removal of shared memory multi-threading in favour of
> using
> processes and channels should never be underestimated as a
> Really Good
> Thing™ that other native code languages (*) have failed to
> do anything
> about. Thus Go wins, others lose.
That's a marketing success as well. Go didn't "remove" shared
memory multi-threading, it just unrecommends it. That's quite
unremarkable from a programming language design standpoint,
but as discussed that's not always crucial for success. --
Andrei
I think you need to show a bit of Go code that uses threads to
be able
to back up that claim.
No, that is the classical "prove that god do not exist" trick.
This is up to Go to prove it is safe. Hint: it isn't.
