On 2015-03-19 1:57 AM, krzaq wrote:
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 08:38:45 UTC, Kagamin wrote:Hmm... I read it as "it shall have the return type of int, but if not, then it's implementation-defined".In that case, I refer you to https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
To be picky (because I live in RFCs)... RFC 2119 doesn't have anything to say about "shall". It does have something to say about "SHALL". The capitalization is important.
