On 3/20/15 10:26 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
You may want to answer there, not here. I've also posted a response.
Andrei
Nitpick: Your solutions that use readText validate their input and the
python version probably doesn't. You could mention that (I cannot
comment on SO).
Yah, nitpicks should go there too. We need to have an understanding that
statistically everybody is on SO and nobody here :o).
Interestingly readText is faster than byChunck.joiner regardless.
I'm not if it does the checking.
Nitpick 2: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode7.0.0/ch05.pdf
(chapter 5.8) splitLines is still incomplete, missing to break on
U+0085, U+000B, U+000C. Would a PR for this be accepted?
Prolly. Walter?
I'd say the coolest answer to this question would have been: D has not
only one of the fastest, but the only correct solution to this that
works with UTF8, UTF16 and UTF32 at the same time.
Well then write that answer.
Andrei
