On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 04:53:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:36:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:32:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over and
over
again and those who use algorithms.
I agree, at some point I learned that there is a huge
cultural distinction between C and C++ programmers.
yes, the other main distinction are the people who correctly
put the * next to the type because it's part of the type, or
the wrong people who put it next to the variable name
because they're heathens
What is the type of b here ?
int* a, b;
int* because I don't use a language that's ruined by C baggage.
You answer a comment about, quoting "C and C++ programmers". If
you don't understand what you are answering to, you probably
shouldn't.
yes, and I answered it with respect to D programmers.
the correct answer for C++ is: if you submit that as a PR, I'm
going to hit you.
