Re: Named unittests

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 3/30/15 2:59 PM, Panke wrote:

I've implemented this in a library and I'm sure others have as well.
Are you sure, you want a language solution?

Basic principle:

---
unittest {

     testCase("a testcase",
     {
         // actual test code here
     });
}
---

Looks a bit too much work.

Testcase registers the structure and the runtime just runs the unittest
as is does today and than calls all closures registered during the
unittest. Makes this fully backward compatible.

Backward compatibility is not an issue seeing this is a pure addition.


Andrei