On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:18:52 +0000, Kapps wrote: > Everything you propose can be done with a custom unittest runner, using > the builtin unittest blocks. Compile-time reflection + UDAs + unittests > is a surprisingly powerful combination, and I don't understand the > proposals to make unittest name and such part of the ModuleInfo or > provide special compiler support for them. Such an approach is not as > scalable, and with compile-time reflection you can do anything you need > with the current built-in unittest blocks.
only if reflection is fully working, which is not the case (see, for example, old bug with member enumeration for packages).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
