On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:24:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I see no value in test names limited to valid identifiers. It is only tiny bit more informative than `unittestXXX` we have already. If we add names, please, let them be proper names that are easy to read.
I'd rather have the name obey the same restrictions as normal function names and keep additional information in optional @description("...")
