On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 22:05:33 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 09:15:01PM +0000, weaselcat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:45:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
>>The reliance on GDC/LDC to produce production-level
>>binaries(i.e,
>>optimized) and the actual people working on them really is
>>worrisome. If Iain or Kai decided one day to leave D, it
>>would be a
>>very big blow I think.
>
>Yes. And considering there is no hope that we bring dmd's
>backend up
>to speed with GCC or LLVM (let's be realistic one second)
>what is
>even more worrisome is how little they are integrated in the
>workflow.
Out of curiosity, what was the communication level between the
decision to switch to ddmd frontend and the ldc/gdc team?
I thought it was public knowledge for a while now that
eventually we're
gonna do this switch? It was just a matter of time. I mean,
Daniel
Murphy hasn't exactly been keeping hush-hush about progress on
ddmd all
this time.
T
I was just curious, didn't mean it to come off any other way : )
