Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Yeah I agree now after reading most of this thread, I know that these
keywords just map to functions.
I've seen a proposal of a global new template somewhere, I don't like
that since at the global scope there are also structs, arrays and
whatnot that can be allocated by 'new'.
Well it's easy to handle all of those with conditional templates.
I don't like the static new either since it prevents subclasses from
overriding their new/delete operations.
What would then be a good way to replace new/delete operators to
still have them overridable? Isn't that the convenience that first
got them to be used in the first place? Other than global new/delete
overrides which is plain silly in D.
I've pretty much found alternatives to all my other points against
taking out new/delete except for the override feature, find me an
alternative for that too and I'll be voting for new/delete to be
runtime function instead of language keywords, cause I can't think of
anything right now.
I think you'd find this article interesting:
http://www.ddj.com/article/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=184405016&dept_url=/java/
Andrei
That was a long read, but a most interesting one! I already was familiar
of these design pattens but only used them where new didn't make sense,
this article really was an eye opener on that level, thanks a lot!
You have my vote to remove new/delete now :)
Someone convinced someone else of something on the Internets. What's
this world coming to???
Andrei
