On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 18:28:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
w0rp:
It doesn't amaze me at the moment, as it's slightly faster for
integers, and slightly slower for strings at the moment.
One problem with D strings is that they don't cache their hash
value.
Bye,
bearophile
I probably need to put that back in for some types. I tried
taking the hash values away. I know that for integers where the
size is <= size_t.sizeof, then I can keep the hash codes out of
the array, as the key is always the same as the hash.
