On 4/7/15 3:29 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 22:22:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/7/15 11:42 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
What's still missing is a faster AST interpreter for CTFE though.

A JIT would be nice. -- Andrei

I'm not so sure CTFE would ever get out of the warmup debt JITs incur,
ctfe bits usually don't live very long.

A JIT would pay off where it matters - intensive use of CTFE leading to long compilations. -- Andrei

Reply via email to