On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:47:37PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 4/7/15 7:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > >On 4/7/2015 3:33 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > >>Until that point, all these discussions on AA updates are useless. > > > >The data structure has changed before (used to be a binary tree) > >without disruption and can change again. > > > > Sure but there are so many gotchas to this thing. Multiple very smart, > very competent developers set out to change the AA and failed. I would > rather effort be spent focusing on getting it into a full-fledged > library type with simple lowering for syntax, and then we can play > with everything we want to do. At least at that point, there aren't > special considerations to worry about. [...]
Didn't somebody check in a whole bunch of PRs already in this direction? IIRC, there are only 1 or 2 more pieces left before AA's can be fully implemented as a library type. T -- People say I'm indecisive, but I'm not sure about that. -- YHL, CONLANG
