On 2015-04-14 18:33, bitwise wrote:

This is one of the main reasons I like the OffsetTypeInfo/offTi()
option. I think a "name" field would have to be added to OffsetTypeInfo
for it to be useful, and I have a feeling that would increase the binary
size by quite a bit.. So I'll have to test it and see.

It needs to be possible to set and get a value of an instance variable based on it's name, through runtime reflection. It also needs to bypass protection, i.e. "private".

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to