You really should pay attention to the deprecation messages.
immutable was unfortunately used as if it was a manifest constant
before, but it ought to be a member of a struct, and that
behaviour is changing. There's been a deprecation message there
for a while, now the behaviour is changing, and eventually you'll
be able to create immutable members of structs without any
warnings, as it will just use the new behaviour.
- Re: WTF: dmd ... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 r... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 r... grm via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 r... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 really... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 really... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 really... w0rp via Digitalmars-d