We can make it an error in 2.067.1 and change semantics in 2.067
- actually I'd recommend to do it that way. Breaking normal
deprecation process is not good.
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 re... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 re... Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 re... Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.067 re... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs.... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd ... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: ... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: ... Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: ... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... grm via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd 2.0... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WTF: dmd 2.066 vs. dmd... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
