On Thursday, 23 April 2015 at 16:00:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Not perfect, but I don't think there really is anything we can do about no-longer-maintained projects. It's not fair to the author that they can have their project taken over and published with their name. At least we can have a way to avoid displaying projects that are broken.

-Steve

Github already allows this, it also makes sure modifications are correctly authored (at least with the author specified in the commit, which can easily be faked). It think it is completely fair, the author published their source for others to use and modify, if someone else can pick up that maintenance fairly easily then they have achieved their goal, otherwise it will die with their loss of interest.

Reply via email to