On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 20:44:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[snip]
I'm afraid we are stuck with autodecoding, as taking it out may
be far too disruptive.
No!
But all is not lost. The Phobos algorithms can all be fixed to
not care about autodecoding. The changes I've made to
std.string all reflect that.
Yay!
I haven't really followed the autodecoding conversations. The
problem is that front on char ranges decode, right? Is there
quick way to tell which functions are auto decoding so we can
have a list of candidates for replacement? It'd be good for
hackweek.
I'm reminded of this conversation
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
which contains a partial list of candidates. Following your lead
with implementing these lazy versions (without autodecoding)
would be good hackweek projects.
Finally, there is this http://goo.gl/Wmotu4 list from
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
that has some good candidates for hackweek I think.
Are we collecting hackweek ideas anywhere?
