On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:24:01AM +0000, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Interesting read, and the conclusion beg the question: why using a > sublanguage for const expression, if it do not provides the guarantee > it is supposed to. > > http://b.atch.se/posts/non-constant-constant-expressions/
Whoa. This is gonna give me nightmares tonight... that is absolutely insane. Yet another proof that something is fundamentally screwed up with the C++ template system... Now I'm certain beyond any doubt that I am *not* going back to C++, ever. T -- I see that you JS got Bach.
