On 4/29/15 10:41 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/29/15 4:29 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
if (dg) // Implicitly converted to (dg.ptr | dg.funcptr) != 0
I don't know if I've ever expected that, you sure that's true? I would
actually expect if(dg) to be equivalent to if(dg.funcptr). I have no
idea how a dg would have a null pointer but valid funcptr.
reverse that, I don't know how a dg would have a null funcptr but valid ptr.
if (aa) // Implicitly converted to (aa.ptr != null)
This is easily fixed when we fix aa to be a library type. We don't need
compiler help to fix this issue (we do need compiler help to remove AA
specialty code from the compiler, but once it's out, we can fix this
without effort).
Hah! without *compiler* effort :)
-Steve
