On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 01:57:45 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
{snip} the overhead per block was only a single bit + the malloc header.
Correction: The overhead was a single bit + 1/128 of the malloc header, because we had 128 blocks per cluster. Thus if having a cluster of 32 blocks, the overhead would be 2 bits per block. A cluster of 16 blocks would have an overhead of 3 bits per block, because my header size is 32 bits and always 4-byte aligned.
