I took a look at std.parallelism and it's beyond what I can do for now. But it seems like this might be a useful project, and not one of unmanageable difficulty...
std.parallelism equivalents for posix fork and multi-machine processing
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d Wed, 13 May 2015 13:30:39 -0700
Is there value to having equivalents to the std.parallelism
approach that works with processes rather than threads, and makes
it easy to manage tasks over multiple machines?
- std.parallelism equivalents for posix fork... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalents for p... weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalents f... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalents f... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalen... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalents for p... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalents f... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equivalen... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism equiv... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallelism ... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.parallel... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
